Re: Implementation Report template and summary table

Yes, there are still some MAYs. 

          Mez





From:
Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com>
To:
Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM@Lotus, "public-wsc-wg@w3.org" 
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Date:
12/15/2009 05:12 PM
Subject:
Re: Implementation Report template and summary table



Do we need to include the ?optional? conformance notation for the table? 
I did not see any clauses that were marked as optional in the draft 
template.

Joe

On 12/11/09 1:07 PM, "Mary Ellen Zurko" <mzurko@us.ibm.com> wrote:

I've taken stabs at both here: 

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/ImplementationReports <
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/ImplementationReports> 

I'd like to spend a little time at our meeting next Wed taking a look at 
them, to see if the format is good and makes sense. Would love to hear any 
feedback on them before then as well. 

         Mez

Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2009 16:26:44 UTC