- From: <michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:00:49 -0500
- To: <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 21:01:35 UTC
That change would effectively address my concern about secure chrome also. Thanks, Mike _____ From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:54 PM To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: ISSUE-133 Plugin Problems How do our definition of Web Page and the Robustiness section interact? (love the typo in the title) http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/133 <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/133> More specifically (than the text in the Issue), my proposal is to add the following to 4.1 directly after the definition of Web Page: "Some of the recommendations in the [Robustness ref] section are easily undermined in the case of a document format interpreted by plug-ins or external systems served as part of the Web interaction, if the code that executes outside of the web user agent does not follow the same recommendations the web user agent does." Coming soon to a meeting near you. Despair and die.
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 21:01:35 UTC