- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:40:17 -0400
- To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 21:48:23 UTC
It seems possible to rephrase this part of 6.4.4 to not be just visual: "For visual user agents, these interactions MUST be presented in a way that makes it impossible for the user to view or interact with the destination web site that caused the danger situation to occur." could instead be: These interactions MUST be presented in a way that makes it impossible for the user go to or interact with the destination web site that caused the danger situation to occur. For the header recommendations, I could use a bit more context (I'm only about two pages into Serge et al's paper; I'm hoping to finish it on the trip out to the RSA conference): "For user agents with a visual user interface, headings of these warnings MUST include words meaning "caution" or "warning". The headings of these warnings MUST be the locus of attention." Why the headings? Is it _just_ about locus of attention? Are there other things about the headings that make them special?
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 21:48:23 UTC