- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:47:41 +0200
- To: wdoyle@mitre.org, Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
On 2008-08-14 08:44:44 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Last Call comments are very slowly starting to appear, so I've
> (finally!) remembered to add the Last Call Working Draft to
> lc-comments-tracker.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/39814/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/
>
> A version of the Working Draft that's annotated with the Last Call
> comments we've gotten is here (it's automatically generated):
>
> http://w3.org/brief/OTM=
So that didn' work... Try this instead:
http://tinyurl.com/6ejgtz
> I entered the comments that I know of so far (two issues that I had
> raised, and which are therefore already in tracker, plus four
> comments that we received otherwise -- and which are all archived on
> the public list --; these do not yet have issues associated).
>
> So far, I believe that only one of the comments qualifies as
> substantive; that's LC-2057:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/39814/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/2057
>
> ... concerning logotypes.
>
> In playing with lc-comments-tracker, it turns out that the process
> of using it is really *very* easy; it would be great if you could
> take over at this point.
>
> I don't remember, Mez, how you wanted to manage the process of
> creating and resolving issues that are associated to comments.
>
> My one preference in this would be that every edit that we make
> going forward should have a tracker issue associated with it, so we
> can track consensus more clearly.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
>
>
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2008 06:48:16 UTC