- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:44:44 +0200
- To: wdoyle@mitre.org, Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Hi Bill, Last Call comments are very slowly starting to appear, so I've (finally!) remembered to add the Last Call Working Draft to lc-comments-tracker. http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/39814/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/ A version of the Working Draft that's annotated with the Last Call comments we've gotten is here (it's automatically generated): http://w3.org/brief/OTM= I entered the comments that I know of so far (two issues that I had raised, and which are therefore already in tracker, plus four comments that we received otherwise -- and which are all archived on the public list --; these do not yet have issues associated). So far, I believe that only one of the comments qualifies as substantive; that's LC-2057: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/39814/WD-wsc-ui-20080724/2057 ... concerning logotypes. In playing with lc-comments-tracker, it turns out that the process of using it is really *very* easy; it would be great if you could take over at this point. I don't remember, Mez, how you wanted to manage the process of creating and resolving issues that are associated to comments. My one preference in this would be that every edit that we make going forward should have a tracker issue associated with it, so we can track consensus more clearly. Thanks, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2008 06:45:22 UTC