Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30

Regrets; off this week.
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>







On 2008-04-29 08:32:55 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:32:55 -0400
> Subject: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30
> List-Id: <public-wsc-wg.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of public-wsc-wg-request@listhub.w3.org
> 	designates 128.30.52.56 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=public-wsc-wg-request@listhub.w3.org
> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/OFB4ED210F.AD4EB50E-ON85257436.004987D3-8525743A.0044EE8E@LocalDomain>
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6
> 
>         Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda
> 
> Calling information:
> Wednesday, 02 April 2008
> 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings
> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080430
> 
> 
> Agenda
> 
> 1) Pick a scribe 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes
> 
> 2) Approve minutes from meetings
> http://www.w3.org/2008/04/16-wsc-minutes.html
> 
> 3) Weekly completed action items
> (Usually checkpointed Friday am, US East Coast time) 
> [pending review] ACTION-406: Ian Fette to Point out user burden concerns 
> w/ petnames in detail - due 2008-03-26
> [pending review] ACTION-410: Anil Saldhana to Update section 5.1.5. 
> Replace last sentence with: "A pinned self-signed certificate SHOULD be 
> considered sufficient identification to allow user agents to associate a 
> Petname with the site, if supported." - due 2008-04-17
> [pending review] ACTION-420: Anil Saldhana to Change 6.4.2 (notification / 
> status) to include "MAY solicit user interaction" - due 2008-04-23
> 
> 4) Open Action Items
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Apr/0052.html
> 
> 5) Action items closed due to inactivity 
> [pending review] ACTION-404: Stephen Farrell to Propose wording for 7.1 
> (chrome and UI practices) to weaken requirement to stuff that makes sense 
> in a given context - due 2008-03-26
> [pending review] ACTION-407: Tyler Close to Refine petname proposal in 
> light of 2008-03-19 call's discussion - due 2008-03-26
> 
> 6) Agenda bashing
> 
> 7) ISSUE-110 POST triggered via JavaScript
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/110
> 
> 8) ISSUE-116 ReconfigureChrome Should users be able to reconfigure primary 
> chrome?
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/116
> 
> 9) ISSUE-128 Strong / weak algorithms?
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/128
> 
> 10) ISSUE-133 Plugin Problems How do our definition of Web Page and the 
> Robustiness section interact? 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/133
> 
> 11) Next meeting - 07 May 2008
> More issues: 
> 
> ISSUE-110 POST triggered via JavaScript
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Nov/0105.html
> 
> ISSUE-116 ReconfigureChrome Should users be able to reconfigure primary 
> chrome?
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Mar/0213.html
> 
> ISSUE-138 Downgrade strength of Issuer field's Organization attribute
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/138
> 
> ISSUE-181 Should there be an authoring practice suggesting http/https URI 
> space consistency
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/181
> 
> ISSUE-183 Automatic Selfsigned Certificate acceptance/probation MUST NOT 
> be implemented unless there is a history capability
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/183
> 
> ISSUE-185 UI recommendations for URI handlers?
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/185
> 
> ISSUE-188 props xit needs an acknowlegements section
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/188
> 
> ISSUE-190 relaxedpathvalidation Relaxed Path Validation - optional, 
> recommended?
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/190
> 
> ISSUE-192 ConformanceChrome Keep Chrome visible if its used for SCI
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/192
> 
> ISSUE-193 MultiPageChrome Make multiple web pages chrome section rfc 
> 2119ed
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/193
> 
> ISSUE-194 SizeMatters Window sizing a must
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/194
> 
> ISSUE-195 RestrictPopups use SHOULD on popup restrictions
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/195
> 
> ISSUE-74 Dependencies on other wgs
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/74
> 
> ISSUE-75 Relation to existing standards and related work
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/75
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 14:14:31 UTC