Re: 6.4 and accessibility

If you created the action for yourself, would you set the due date to one 
you'd make? Otherwise I'll just end up nagging you about the one I 
created. 

Or tell me the real due date you'll make, and I'll create it. 




From:
Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana@redhat.com>
To:
Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Cc:
Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Date:
04/24/2008 06:23 PM
Subject:
Re: 6.4 and accessibility



I will get this done.....  Would you be able to give me an action on this?

Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> For the non visual rephrasing, nobody seems to mind. Thomas and Anil, 
can 
> you make it so? 
> 
> And nobody can explain the header recommendations? So should we remove 
> them? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:
> Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM
> To:
> public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date:
> 03/28/2008 05:34 PM
> Subject:
> 6.4 and accessibility
> 
> 
> It seems possible to rephrase this part of 6.4.4 to not be just visual:
> 
> "For visual user agents, these interactions MUST be presented in a way 
> that makes it impossible for the user to view or interact with the 
> destination web site that caused the danger situation to occur."
> 
> could instead be:
> These interactions MUST be presented in a way that makes it impossible 
for 
> the user go to or interact with the destination web site that caused the 

> danger situation to occur.
> 
> For the header recommendations, I could use a bit more context (I'm only 

> about two pages into Serge et al's paper; I'm hoping to finish it on the 

> trip out to the RSA conference): 
> 
> "For user agents with a visual user interface, headings of these 
warnings 
> MUST include words meaning "caution" or "warning". The headings of these 

> warnings MUST be the locus of attention."
> 
> Why the headings? Is it _just_ about locus of attention? Are there other 

> things about the headings that make them special?