- From: Johnathan Nightingale <johnath@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:46:58 -0400
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: Ian Fette <ifette@google.com>, Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Ian is likely referring to the Firefox 2 behaviour on phishing sites. Visiting: http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/its-a-trap.html On FF3 will get you a similar looking warning to the malware warning you pasted, but visiting it on FF2 will get you our old dim-the-page, speech-bubble approach. Cheers, J On 2-Apr-08, at 5:31 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2008-03-28 12:35:44 -0700, Ian Fette wrote: > >> Hmm.... question on what this implies. "6.4 Danger" says the user >> can't view the page. Does something like Firefox where the page >> is dimmed, and the user can't interact with the page, but they >> can still see what the page looks like, does that count as >> viewing the page? > > Is there a test page where one could see the behavior in action? > What precisely triggers it? > > The behavior I'm familiar with is the one triggered by this page: > > http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/its-an-attack.html > > (Screen shot attached.) > > Speaking from the intent of the current text (which might need > further clarification), I understand Danger behavior to be safe for > drive-by malware sites, i.e., the browser must not download or > execute anything. Maybe that actually needs to be said in the text. > > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> > <firefox-malware.png> --- Johnathan Nightingale Human Shield johnath@mozilla.com
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 12:47:41 UTC