- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:31:10 +0200
- To: Ian Fette <ifette@google.com>
- Cc: Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 09:31:44 UTC
On 2008-03-28 12:35:44 -0700, Ian Fette wrote: > Hmm.... question on what this implies. "6.4 Danger" says the user > can't view the page. Does something like Firefox where the page > is dimmed, and the user can't interact with the page, but they > can still see what the page looks like, does that count as > viewing the page? Is there a test page where one could see the behavior in action? What precisely triggers it? The behavior I'm familiar with is the one triggered by this page: http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/its-an-attack.html (Screen shot attached.) Speaking from the intent of the current text (which might need further clarification), I understand Danger behavior to be safe for drive-by malware sites, i.e., the browser must not download or execute anything. Maybe that actually needs to be said in the text. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 09:31:44 UTC