Re: "reputation"? Re: Some major edits just checked in.

On 2008-03-28 12:35:44 -0700, Ian Fette wrote:

> Hmm.... question on what this implies. "6.4 Danger" says the user
> can't view the page. Does something like Firefox where the page
> is dimmed, and the user can't interact with the page, but they
> can still see what the page looks like, does that count as
> viewing the page?

Is there a test page where one could see the behavior in action?
What precisely triggers it?

The behavior I'm familiar with is the one triggered by this page:

  http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/its-an-attack.html

(Screen shot attached.)

Speaking from the intent of the current text (which might need
further clarification), I understand Danger behavior to be safe for
drive-by malware sites, i.e., the browser must not download or
execute anything. Maybe that actually needs to be said in the text.

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 09:31:44 UTC