- From: Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana@redhat.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:17:38 -0500
- CC: "public-wsc-wg@w3.org" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Hi Mike,
I have an action item to incorporate your general principles.
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/292
I will not get to it until next Wed.
Regards,
Anil
michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com wrote:
>
> Question for Thomas or Anil --
> Is the rec track draft (
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html
> <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html> ) intended to
> incorporate all the recommendation display proposals (
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals
> <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals> )
> that made it into the proper template format and survived lightning
> discussion?
>
> Of the 3 that I submitted, only one (favicons) seems to be in the
> current draft. Another (security protocol errors) looks like it may
> have a placeholder ("5.3 McCormicks general principles go here"). The
> third one (page security scoring) seems to be totally missing.
>
> What is the process for getting a recommendation that was discussed
> and properly formatted into the draft? Let me know what else I need
> to do.
>
> Thanks, Mike
>
> * Michael McCormick, CISSP *
> Lead Architect, Information Security Technology
> Wells Fargo Bank
>
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2007 17:17:54 UTC