- From: <michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:10:31 -0500
- To: <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <9D471E876696BE4DA103E939AE64164D30FA93@msgswbmnmsp17.wellsfargo.com>
Question for Thomas or Anil -- Is the rec track draft (http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html) intended to incorporate all the recommendation display proposals (http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals) that made it into the proper template format and survived lightning discussion? Of the 3 that I submitted, only one (favicons) seems to be in the current draft. Another (security protocol errors) looks like it may have a placeholder ("5.3 McCormicks general principles go here"). The third one (page security scoring) seems to be totally missing. What is the process for getting a recommendation that was discussed and properly formatted into the draft? Let me know what else I need to do. Thanks, Mike > Michael McCormick, CISSP > Lead Architect, Information Security Technology > Wells Fargo Bank > > > "THESE OPINIONS ARE STRICTLY MY OWN AND NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF WELLS > FARGO" > This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. > If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the > addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based > on this message or any information herein. If you have received this > message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail > and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. >
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2007 17:11:26 UTC