Re: Is rec track draft complete?

Since "page security scoring" seems to have been silently dropped, I'll 
put discussion and decisions for the FPWD on the agenda for Austin. 

All, let me know of any other gaps that need covering before FPWD.

          Mez







Re: Is rec track draft complete?

Anil Saldhana 
to:
public-wsc-wg
09/13/2007 01:49 PM


Sent by:
public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
Cc:
"public-wsc-wg@w3.org"








Hi Mike,
  I have an action item to incorporate your general principles.
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/292

I will not get to it until next Wed.

Regards,
Anil
 

michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com wrote:
>
> Question for Thomas or Anil --
> Is the rec track draft ( 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html 
> <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html> ) intended to 
> incorporate all the recommendation display proposals ( 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals 
> <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals> ) 
> that made it into the proper template format and survived lightning 
> discussion?
>
> Of the 3 that I submitted, only one (favicons) seems to be in the 
> current draft.  Another (security protocol errors) looks like it may 
> have a placeholder ("5.3 McCormicks general principles go here").  The 
> third one (page security scoring) seems to be totally missing.
>
> What is the process for getting a recommendation that was discussed 
> and properly formatted into the draft?  Let me know what else I need 
> to do.
>
> Thanks, Mike
>
> * Michael McCormick, CISSP *
> Lead Architect, Information Security Technology
> Wells Fargo Bank
>