Re: ACTION-312 Provide a first pass of associating wiki links with the FPWD text

On 2007-10-12 02:59:23 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:

> I like my text better. It gets across my concerns, and the
> concerns raised by a number of wg members, which I hate to ignore
> and prefer to respect. I know you usually have your reasons. Can
> you share them? If it really just seems too long, I suggest
> that's not a strong enough reason to water it down, given the
> discussion at the f2f. 

Well, among other things, the mailing list archives and minutes are
also critical for understanding the group's reasoning -- the wiki
entries mostly (not exclusively!) include the reasoning of those who
proposed things.

I'd rather not go down that route (though the links to tracker all
across the document should actually help with this point) too
deeply.  Therefore my preference for a relatively neutral pointer.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>







> Re: ACTION-312 Provide a first pass of associating wiki links   with the 
> FPWD text
> 
> Thomas Roessler 
> to:
> Mary Ellen Zurko
> 10/11/2007 10:51 AM
> 
> 
> Sent by:
> public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
> Cc:
> public-wsc-wg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2007-10-05 10:00:34 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> 
> > The following links provide background, motivation, and usability 
> concerns 
> > for portions of the proposals in this section. They are critical reading 
> 
> > for an understanding of the reasoning process of the working group to 
> > date. 
> 
> That's quite a mouthful.  I'd suggest to just say "Please refer to
> the following entries in the Working Group's Wiki for relevant
> background information".
> 
> > 
> > Mapping:
> > 
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/FavIcon
> > into
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#site-identifying
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/CertErr
> > into
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#error-handling
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/SafeWebBrowsingTemplate
> > into
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#usage-sbm
> > 
> > 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/PersonallyIdentifiableInformationEditorBar
> > into 
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#ceremonies
> 
> That one is stale by now; instead, linking to SafeWebFormEditor.
> 
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/EVCerts
> > into
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#sect-evcerts
> > 
> > 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/Letterhead
> > into
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#sec-logotypes
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#signal-content
> > 
> > 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/BrowserLockDown
> 
> > into 
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#usage-framework
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/PageScore
> > into
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#pageinfosummary
> > [remember to integrate the results of ACTION-307 there.]
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/IdentitySignal
> > into
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#IdentitySignal
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/WhatIsASecurePage
> > into
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#tlsforweb
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/PageInfoSummary
> > into
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#pageinfosummary
> > 
> > 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/NoSecurityIndicator
> 
> > into
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#sec-nointeraction
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RobustSharedSecret
> > into
> > 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#robustness-trustedpath
> 
> That one is referenced anyway.
> 
> Draft updated.
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
>

Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 10:41:08 UTC