Re: ACTION-312 Provide a first pass of associating wiki links with the FPWD text

I like my text better. It gets across my concerns, and the concerns raised 
by a number of wg members, which I hate to ignore and prefer to respect. I 
know you usually have your reasons. Can you share them? If it really just 
seems too long, I suggest that's not a strong enough reason to water it 
down, given the discussion at the f2f. 

          Mez







Re: ACTION-312 Provide a first pass of associating wiki links   with the 
FPWD text

Thomas Roessler 
to:
Mary Ellen Zurko
10/11/2007 10:51 AM


Sent by:
public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
Cc:
public-wsc-wg








On 2007-10-05 10:00:34 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:

> The following links provide background, motivation, and usability 
concerns 
> for portions of the proposals in this section. They are critical reading 

> for an understanding of the reasoning process of the working group to 
> date. 

That's quite a mouthful.  I'd suggest to just say "Please refer to
the following entries in the Working Group's Wiki for relevant
background information".

> 
> Mapping:
> 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/FavIcon
> into
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#site-identifying
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/CertErr
> into
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#error-handling
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/SafeWebBrowsingTemplate
> into
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#usage-sbm
> 
> 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/PersonallyIdentifiableInformationEditorBar
> into 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#ceremonies

That one is stale by now; instead, linking to SafeWebFormEditor.

> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/EVCerts
> into
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#sect-evcerts
> 
> 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/Letterhead
> into
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#sec-logotypes
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#signal-content
> 
> 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/BrowserLockDown

> into 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#usage-framework
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/PageScore
> into
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#pageinfosummary
> [remember to integrate the results of ACTION-307 there.]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/IdentitySignal
> into
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#IdentitySignal
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/WhatIsASecurePage
> into
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#tlsforweb
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/PageInfoSummary
> into
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#pageinfosummary
> 
> 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/NoSecurityIndicator

> into
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#sec-nointeraction
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RobustSharedSecret
> into
> 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#robustness-trustedpath

That one is referenced anyway.

Draft updated.

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>