- From: Sverdlov, Yakov <Yakov.Sverdlov@ca.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:23:16 -0500
- To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Thomas, I think Hal convinced me that the Identity 2.0 use case is just one of many Federation/SSO scenarios. That's why we do not need to cover it separately IMO. Regards, Yakov Sverdlov CA -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:tlr@w3.org] Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 5:04 PM To: Sverdlov, Yakov Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: SSOFederatedIdentity (Re: Use cases in Note) On 2007-01-18 19:03:28 -0600, Close, Tyler J. wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/SSOFederatedIdentity > > These services sound like applications in their own right and it looks > like they are still competing with each other on what the application > should be. Should we really be trying to standardize the presentation of > still developing applications? Let's come back to this one. The last discussion between Yakov and Hal ended somewhat inconclusively. Yakov: Are there any usage modalities or interactions that derive from this that you suggest we deal with? If so: Could you try to identify these more specifically, and also talk a bit about the questions related to security context that come up? I'm suspecting that the main point of this use case is ultimately quite similar to the generic TLS authentication interaction. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 22 January 2007 14:23:23 UTC