- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:55:55 -0500
- To: ses@ll.mit.edu
- Cc: "public-wsc-wg@w3.org" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>,public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 14:56:24 UTC
> >> The FireFox 2 tabs contain a window close button that used to be
part
> > of
> >> the window frame. Presumably they were moved here because users
didn't
> >> understand, or weren't comfortable with, the model in which a close
icon
> > for
> >> the window closed a tab.
> >
> > So that sounds like data that could be used to argue the scoping is
> > effective.
> >
> > Mez
>
> I don't understand the logic there. Firefox 2 is moving away from
the
> model in which users are presumed to understand that all browser buttons
> within a window apply to the current tab. They are moving to a model in
> which you have to explicitly show the user that the button applies to
the
> tab by putting it into the tab itself. How would you argue that this
change
> supports the effectiveness of the scoping?
I think we're saying the same thing, but perhaps I'm not saying it
effectively. It sounds like the tab is an effective scoping mechanism, in
that things inside the tab clearly refer to things inside the tab.
Therefore, if there is a security context indicator, and it refers to
what's in the tab, it needs to be inside the tab.
Mez
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 14:56:24 UTC