- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:09:25 -0400
- To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF7B65F863.63C4EAE6-ON852572C6.00742536-852572C6.00743704@LocalDomain>
Just to be clear, this doesn't yet discharge the action. The intent behind the action is to update the text so that it is a recommendation (or moving in that direction), and, as you note, in the wiki. Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 04/23/2007 02:59 PM To public-wsc-wg@w3.org cc Subject Re: Rough rec proposal: revisiting past decisions Discharging ACTION-198, again by e-mail and not yet in the Wiki since I'm offline. - MEZ asked what the relationship was with possible "drill-down" related requirements from the accessibility community. That's unknown at this point, and no action item was issued to follow up. (Oooops, I wonder if there should be one.) - Johnathan indicated that he likes the distinction between "native trust" and personal overrides. - Johnathan asked whether the proposal was to have an overall log of decisions; Thomas indicated that that might be valuable, but that the key part was getting a sense of where trust in the current context comes from. Source: http://www.w3.org/2007/04/18-wsc-minutes.html -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 2007-04-02 16:37:02 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> > To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org > Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:37:02 +0200 > Subject: Rough rec proposal: revisiting past decisions > X-Spam-Level: > X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5 > > Where users are offered with the ability to conditionally proceed > with a transaction based on the detection of security issues, they > need to be enabled to revisit these decisions when undergoing an > interaction that is affected by them. > > - activate through some general "help me" secure attention sequence? > - shoul "revisit" involve reviewing or also changing past decisions? > > Cheers, > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> > >
Received on Monday, 23 April 2007 21:09:39 UTC