Re: Rough rec proposal: revisiting past decisions

Discharging ACTION-198, again by e-mail and not yet in the Wiki
since I'm offline.

- MEZ asked what the relationship was with possible "drill-down"
  related requirements from the accessibility community.  That's
  unknown at this point, and no action item was issued to follow up.
  (Oooops, I wonder if there should be one.)

- Johnathan indicated that he likes the distinction between "native
  trust" and personal overrides.
  
- Johnathan asked whether the proposal was to have an overall log of
  decisions; Thomas indicated that that might be valuable, but that
  the key part was getting a sense of where trust in the current
  context comes from.

Source: http://www.w3.org/2007/04/18-wsc-minutes.html

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>







On 2007-04-02 16:37:02 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:37:02 +0200
> Subject: Rough rec proposal: revisiting past decisions
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5
> 
> Where users are offered with the ability to conditionally proceed
> with a transaction based on the detection of security issues, they
> need to be enabled to revisit these decisions when undergoing an
> interaction that is affected by them.
> 
> - activate through some general "help me" secure attention sequence?
> - shoul "revisit" involve reviewing or also changing past decisions?
> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
>

Received on Monday, 23 April 2007 21:03:13 UTC