- From: Mike Beltzner <beltzner@mozilla.com>
- Date: Sat Dec 09 01:24:11 2006
- To: "W3 Work Group" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
While I agree that "synchronized breakage" is the way to go, some users will consider older browsers to be non-broken, so giving some feedback will be required. Plus it's a nice, communicative way to behave. :) cheers, mike -----Original Message----- From: George Staikos <staikos@kde.org> Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:56:40 To:W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> Subject: Re: Action Item 18 - understand/visualize the strength of SSL On 8-Dec-06, at 5:58 AM, Doyle, Bill wrote: > > My feeling is that if the browser blocks the site and does not provide > feedback as to why and how to proceed, the user will find another > browser that works and will stop using the "broken" browser. If > feedback is not provided, the user learns nothing other than a > particular browser blocked the site. This is exactly why we need to 'break' all the major browsers simultaneously. Make the alternative hard, and the user will start to get the hint. -- George Staikos KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/ Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/
Received on Saturday, 9 December 2006 01:24:11 UTC