W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > March 2007

Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2007/03/27

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:51:08 +0200
To: SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1174920668.27696.160.camel@localhost>

Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2007/03/27
Dial-in information (member-only) [1]
Zakim instructions [2]

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-semann/2007Mar/0012
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim


----------------------------------------
1. Call setup
 - Scribe list: (active)    LF, RA, BNS, EP, TV, CP, JF, 
                            PM, CV, HL, AS, LH, AM, CB
                (inactive)  JBD, JL, MK, JH, NG, TP
 - Any modifications to agenda?
 - Any other business?


----------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes of our last telcon
 - Minutes of last call [1]

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20070320


----------------------------------------
3. Action Item Review
 - Action item list [1]

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/admin/#Actions

2006-11-21: Eric to upgrade the SPDL page for SAWSDL readers and then work
            things out with the Usage Guide
 - pending?


----------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
 - Any tutorials, articles, presentations, tools, projects, 
   applications, demos, portals for our WG page?
   - WG page updated with all the emailed links
   - Check if I got your tool/article
 - WSDL 2.0 PR is delayed, which gives us additional 3-4 weeks to catch up


----------------------------------------
5. Implementation status
 - Implementation report [1]
 - Test suite [2]
 - Status of your implementations?
   - Two WSDL 2.0 parsers - Woden (UGA), WSMO4J?
   - One WSDL 1.1 parser (with attrExtensions support) - UGA, IBM?
   - RDF mapping - DERI
   - Specs using SAWSDL - OU, DERI

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/Overview.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/testsuite.html


----------------------------------------
6. Future of the Working Group
 - Summary of our last discussion at [1]
 - After we get to Proposed Rec, we can suggest to do further work
 - We'd need to formulate new charter, to be approved by the AC
 - Or we can suggest new WG(s), declare success and dissolve
 - In all cases, we need to be fairly concrete in our suggestions

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2007Mar/0004
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 14:51:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:46 UTC