- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:07:48 +0100
- To: Marin Dimitrov <marin.dimitrov@ontotext.com>
- Cc: SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
The reasoning is that new versions of WSDL can mostly be done with extensions, or that they can have http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl3 etc. Anyway, the feeling in the WSDL group is that no new version is coming soon anyway. Best regards, Jacek On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 11:54 +0100, Marin Dimitrov wrote: > Jacek Kopecky wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > the WSDL WG just decided today to change the WSDL namespace from > > http://www.w3.org/2006/01/wsdl to http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl > > > > We have previously discussed the shorter form as well, and we decided to > > stay with a dated namespace, because WSDL had it. Now it doesn't - > > should we change our namespace to match WSDL's form, or should we keep > > it as it is? > > > > What do you think? > > > > but this way don't they lose the versioning ability? How many different > specification versions can they map into the "http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl" > namespace? > > best, > > Marin > > ---- > "...what you brought from your past, is of no use in your present. When > you must choose a new path, do not bring old experiences with you. > Those who strike out afresh, but who attempt to retain a little of the > old life, end up torn apart by their own memories. " >
Received on Friday, 23 February 2007 11:07:54 UTC