- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:26:57 +0200
- To: Joel Farrell <joelf@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: jam@cs.uga.edu, public-ws-semann@w3.org
Hi all, also thanks to John for the comments. I have one suggestion below. On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 14:55 -0400, Joel Farrell wrote: > > All subsections 2.1.1 - 2.1.7 have examples, except > > 2.1.5 Complex Types. Is there a reason? > > > > The section is basically an introduction to the concept of annotating > complex types, with the examples in the subsequent sections. I note that none of the 2.1.x sections puts modelReference on complexType as such, this would probably be useful. Also, 2.1.6 puts modelReferences on elements within a complex type, but it could also put the modelReferences on global elements. So I'd suggest that we move the current example from 2.1.6 to 2.1.5, add another modelReference on the complexType (or add an example with that), and add new example in 2.1.6 that puts modelReferences on global elements. Or do you think it's overkill? I'll put the whole set of John's comments as a new editorial issue, just so that we don't forget it. 8-) Thanks, Jacek
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 14:27:11 UTC