Re: Semantic Annotations for WSDL document

John,

Thanks for the good comments. Replies  below.

Joel

public-ws-semann-request@w3.org wrote on 10/08/2006 08:45:21 PM:

>
>
> Joel, Holger and Jacek,
>
> I was reading through the Semantic Annotations for WSDL document
> and noticed that there are two sections marked 2.1.6
> (second one should be 2.1.7)

Yes, will fix.

>
> All subsections 2.1.1 - 2.1.7 have examples, except
> 2.1.5 Complex Types.  Is there a reason?
>

The section is basically an introduction to the concept of annotating
complex types, with the examples in the subsequent sections.

> Wonder if faults should have lifting and lowering mappings
> as well, since they have data objects with types?

The types defined in fault messages can have lifting and lowering mappings.
The modelReference on fault is more closely related to operation
annotations.

>
> Possible missing boldface in the some of the examples, e.g.,
>
>  xs:element name="orderItem" type="itemType"
>
sawsdl:liftingSchemaMapping="http://example.org/mapping/OrderItem2Ont.xslt
> "/>

Yes, will fix.

>
> Finally, is this table right?
>
>                modelReference liftingSchemaMapping loweringSchemaMapping
> <interface>         yes              no                    no
> <operation>         yes              no                    no
> <complexType>       yes              yes                   yes
> <simpleType>        yes              yes                   yes
> <element>           yes              yes                   yes
> <attribute>         yes              no                    no
> <fault>             yes              no                    no
>

That accurately reflects the current spec.  The complexType, simpleType and
element rows refer to global definitions.

> Thanks,
> John
>