RE: SAWSDL Category [section 2.3 of Semantic Annotations for WSDL ]

Dear Pierre,

if I understand you correctly, you're saying that we should be using a
single URI for a single taxonomy category. I fully agree with you on
that.

The WG has agreed to treat issue 20 as editorial, so it's up to the
editors (Joel and Holger) if they can use the UDDI taxonomy URIs in our
examples somewhere. If you have any concrete suggestions on this, please
do let us know. 8-)

Best regards, Jacek

On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 17:45 +0200, Pierre.CHATEL@fr.thalesgroup.com
wrote:
> Thanks Jacek for opening a new issue on the subject.
> 
> I understand that the spec is independent of any taxonomies, but it
> does not mean that a given taxonomie shouldn't always be referenced by
> its "normalized" URI.
> For instance, if I want to publish the categorization information of a
> SAWSDL declaration into UDDI, I need to make a correspondence between
> the taxonomy tModels already available in my UDDI registry and the
> taxonomyURI attribute of the sawsdl:category element.
> 
> 1. If there is a corresponding tModel (sawsdl:category = the value of
> an overviewURL of a given tModel;
> http://www.uddi.org/taxonomies/UDDI_Taxonomy_tModels.htm#NAICS  for
> example) then I know I'll need to use the tModelKey of this tModel.
> 
> 2. If there is no corresponding tModel, I'll need to publish a new one
> with the value of the sawsdl:category taxonomyURI attribute as its
> overviewURL value THEN go back to step 1.
> 
> If the NAICS taxonomy can be referenced by any uri, there is no way a
> publishing component can *automatically* publish a SAWSDL declaration
> using the categorization information...
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong :-)
> 
> Pierre

Received on Tuesday, 4 July 2006 13:40:17 UTC