- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 16:50:41 -0500
- To: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF7471FFB5.4C85F9E0-ON85257836.0076C4D0-85257836.0077FF4A@us.ibm.com>
The MEX spec is pretty consistent in that it talks about the @Identifier
attribute being optional on the MetadataSection element - but _if_ present
that it must be some dialect specific value. EVD follows this rule too.
If we believe that its asking too much for the service to determine the
@Identifier value for an incoming piece of metadata (so that, like your
example shows, people can query by the @Identifier later on) then I would
think it would asking too much for a client to do it too. Take the case of
a generic MEX client that is trying to move metadata from one service to
another - it might Get metadata w/o the @Identifier attribute but then its
expected to add it before it did the Put.
What if we took a different approach. What if we required the
@Identifier attribute to always be present on a MetadataSection element
_if_ the value is defined for that type of metadata. So, in our world, it
MUST always be present for wsdl, xsd, policy and evd. However,
@Identifier would still be optional for queries (GetMetadata/Dialect
elements). By this I mean, when someone does a GetMetadata they are free
to leave it out of the query - it just means they don't care about its
value. However, the result MUST have the @Identifier set. In other
words, @Identifier is only optional on a MetadataSection element IFF the
metadata type doesn't define how to calculate it - and in those cases its
ALWAYS absent.
The only other option I can see is to remove @Identifier all together -
and if we really wanted people to be able to filter their queries then let
them pass in an XPath expression on the GetMetadata - then they can filter
by anything they want. But that might be too big of a change.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
02/13/2011 03:46 PM
To
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
cc
Subject
WS-MEX and putting undifferentiated MEX sections
Suppose a MEX-enabled service is presented with the following request
(SOAP envelope omitted for brevity):
<mex:PutMetadata>
<mex:Metadata>
<mex:MetadataSection Dialect="wsevd:EventDescriptions">
<wsevd:EventDescriptions targetNamespace=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/test/scenario"
xmlns:sce=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/test/scenario"
xmlns:wsevd=
"http://www.w3.org/2011/01/ws-evd"
xmlns:xs=
"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
...
</wsevd:EventDescriptions>
</mex:MetadataSection>
</mex:Metadata>
</mex:PutMetadata>
Notice how the above request does NOT contain an @Identifier on the
MetadataSection element. As far as I can tell, this is both schema valid
and spec conformant (the language of Section 6.3 PutMetadata seems to hint
that both @Dialect and @Identifier are expected, but nowhere does it state
that @Identifier is required).
You can probably guess where this is going; what if, subsequent to this
request, you receive the following request
<mex:GetMetadata>
<mex:Dialect Type="wsevd:EventDescriptions"
Identifier="
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/test/scenario"
Content=
"http://www.w3.org/2011/01/ws-mex/Content/Metadata"/>
</ws:GetMetadata>
The issuer of such a request might reasonably expect to receive the
EventDescriptions from the previous PutMetadata operation, but how is the
MEX implementation supposed to know that the @Identifier for the EVD
(supplied in the PutMetadata) is
"http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/test/scenario"? You could build handlers
that recognize various @Dialect values and know how to pull the relevant
identifier out of the metadata itself, but this isn't a tractable general
solution.
I think we need to require that MetadaSections in the Metadata element use
in a PutMetadata contain an @Identifier. I propose we add the following
sentence to the end of the first paragraph of the description of
[Body]/mex:PutMetadata/mex:Metadata:
The mex:MetadataSections of this mex:Metadata element are REQUIRED to
contain the @Identifier attribute (in addition to the mandatory @Dialect
attribute).
~ gp
Received on Sunday, 13 February 2011 21:51:37 UTC