- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:53:55 -0500
- To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF8C20E370.D6EC103A-ON8525782A.00832B71-8525782A.00834850@us.ibm.com>
All please review the bug 11899 ( http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11899 ) - Li has found some interesting info and I think we're better off if we just remove the entire text in question. If people are ok with this perhaps we can re-resolve it thru email. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. ----- Forwarded by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM on 02/01/2011 06:52 PM ----- bugzilla@jessica.w3.org Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-notifications-request@w3.org 02/01/2011 06:50 PM To public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org cc Subject [Bug 11899] All: fault section table is missing both soap versions http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11899 --- Comment #4 from Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> 2011-02-01 23:50:45 UTC --- Actually, I'd prefer to just remove those lines of text from the spec. Meaning remove: - - - - For SOAP 1.2, the [Code] property MUST be either "Sender" or "Receiver". These properties are serialized into text XML as follows: <table> SOAP Version Sender Receiver SOAP 1.2 s12:Sender s12:Receiver </table> - - - - - We don't need the mapping table since each Code property already has either s12:Sender or s12:Receiver - this makes the table pointless. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:54:35 UTC