- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:06:47 -0500
- To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF7C3C8CEB.F4038D93-ON852576A3.000E9574-852576A4.00530995@us.ibm.com>
Proposal:
WS-Eventing:
In sections 4.2 (Renew), 4.3 (GetStatus), 4.4 (Unsubscribe) replace:
If the subscription is not active, the request MUST fail and the
subscription manager MAY generate a wse:UnknownSubscription fault.
with:
If the request message reaches a conformat implemention of
WS-Eventing and the message refers to an unknown subscription, then the
implemention MUST generate a wse:UnknownSubscription fault.
Fix the definition of UnknownSubscription fault since we bounce between
'active' and 'known' and people might wonder what's the diff:
UnknownSubscription
This fault is generated when a request specifies a subscription
that is not known.
[Code] s12:Sender
[Subcode] wse:UnknownSubscription
[Reason] the subscription is not known.
[Detail] none
Basically, s/active/known/g
In WS-Transfer:
Define an UnknownResource fault:
UnknownResource
This fault is generated when a request specifies a resource that
is not known.
[Code] s12:Sender
[Subcode] wst:UnknownResource
[Reason] the resource is not known.
[Detail] none
And add to Get, Put and Delete:
If the request message reaches a conformat implemention of
WS-Transfer and the message refers to an unknown resource, then the
implementation MUST generate a wst:UnknownResource fault.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2010 15:08:20 UTC