- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:06:47 -0500
- To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF7C3C8CEB.F4038D93-ON852576A3.000E9574-852576A4.00530995@us.ibm.com>
Proposal: WS-Eventing: In sections 4.2 (Renew), 4.3 (GetStatus), 4.4 (Unsubscribe) replace: If the subscription is not active, the request MUST fail and the subscription manager MAY generate a wse:UnknownSubscription fault. with: If the request message reaches a conformat implemention of WS-Eventing and the message refers to an unknown subscription, then the implemention MUST generate a wse:UnknownSubscription fault. Fix the definition of UnknownSubscription fault since we bounce between 'active' and 'known' and people might wonder what's the diff: UnknownSubscription This fault is generated when a request specifies a subscription that is not known. [Code] s12:Sender [Subcode] wse:UnknownSubscription [Reason] the subscription is not known. [Detail] none Basically, s/active/known/g In WS-Transfer: Define an UnknownResource fault: UnknownResource This fault is generated when a request specifies a resource that is not known. [Code] s12:Sender [Subcode] wst:UnknownResource [Reason] the resource is not known. [Detail] none And add to Get, Put and Delete: If the request message reaches a conformat implemention of WS-Transfer and the message refers to an unknown resource, then the implementation MUST generate a wst:UnknownResource fault. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2010 15:08:20 UTC