Re: Issue 7553 - Comments on proposal

I'm confused. It looks like Ram is collapsing two similar cases into a 
single case, but I don't think the cases are similar. If the Event 
Source has a problem with the content of the Subscribe message it should 
generate a SOAP 1.1 Client fault or a SOAP 1.2 Sender fault.

- gp

On 10/13/2009 8:09 AM, Katy Warr wrote:
>
> Ram
> That looks like a good improvement to me.
> Thanks,
> Katy
>
> From: 	Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
> To: 	Katy Warr/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> Cc: 	"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" 
> <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
> Date: 	13/10/2009 15:33
> Subject: 	Issue 7553 - Comments on proposal
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Katy,
>  
> The proposal _http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=770_ for 
> issue 7553 has the following paragraph:
>  
>
> Ø  If the event source chooses not to accept a subscription due to the 
> content of the Subscribe message, then the event source MUST generate 
> a SOAP 1.1 Server fault or a SOAP 1.2 Receiver fault. If the event 
> source does not accept this subscription due to an internal processing 
> reason and not due to the specific content of the Subscribe message, 
> then the event source MUST generate a SOAP 1.1 Server fault or a SOAP 
> 1.2 Receiver fault.
> I suggest changing it as follows:
>  
>
> Ø  If the event source chooses not to accept a subscription due to the 
> content of the Subscribe message or due to internal processing 
> reasons, then the event source MUST generate a SOAP 1.1 Server fault 
> or a SOAP 1.2 Receiver fault.
> Thanks.
>  
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with 
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 
> 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>