Re: Issue 7553 - Comments on proposal

Ram
That looks like a good improvement to me.
Thanks,
Katy


From:
Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
To:
Katy Warr/UK/IBM@IBMGB
Cc:
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Date:
13/10/2009 15:33
Subject:
Issue 7553 - Comments on proposal



Hi Katy,
 
The proposal http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=770 for issue 
7553 has the following paragraph:
 
Ø  If the event source chooses not to accept a subscription due to the 
content of the Subscribe message, then the event source MUST generate a 
SOAP 1.1 Server fault or a SOAP 1.2 Receiver fault. If the event source 
does not accept this subscription due to an internal processing reason and 
not due to the specific content of the Subscribe message, then the event 
source MUST generate a SOAP 1.1 Server fault or a SOAP 1.2 Receiver fault. 

I suggest changing it as follows:
 
Ø  If the event source chooses not to accept a subscription due to the 
content of the Subscribe message or due to internal processing reasons, 
then the event source MUST generate a SOAP 1.1 Server fault or a SOAP 1.2 
Receiver fault. 
Thanks.
 







Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU