Re: new proposal for 7911

In looking at the specs, I think the "Compliance Section" for each spec 
might be the best spot for this text.  If we had an "implemention 
considerations" section for all specs then that would be better, but we 
don't.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
11/17/2009 03:02 PM

To
public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
cc

Subject
new proposal for 7911







forwarding... 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. 
----- Forwarded by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM on 11/17/2009 03:02 PM ----- 
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-notifications-request@w3.org 
11/17/2009 03:00 PM 


To
public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org 
cc

Subject
[Bug 7911] mismatching action and body wrapper








http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7911





--- Comment #8 from Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>  2009-11-17 20:00:51 ---
A new version of the text - making it a bit more generic:

The Basic Profile defines an operation signature as a comination of the
[Action] 
property and the QName of the [Body] child.  An implementation that 
examines 
just one of those values, but at multiple points during the entire 
processing 
of the message, are advised to ensure that the values that are used each 
time 
are consistent. 


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.