- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:30:20 -0400
- To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF3A740C81.11B1840F-ON852575B4.00497AF4-852575B4.004A325C@us.ibm.com>
Wu, would it be possible for you to produce some sample WSDL (and/or policy if necessary) to show what the metadata would look like when events are wrapped? Its never been quite clear to me whether or not the formatting information appears in the metadata that describes the events. For example, let's say there are 5 different Format URIs that an event source supports - would the metadata (wsdl?) need to include all 5 variants for all events that are generated? That seems like a lot of metadata. Or would the metadata just include the base (raw) version and the definition of the 4 other Format URIs _imply_ what the XML on the wire would look like? I've always thought it was the latter (easier for my simple head to process :-), but I'm pretty sure not everyone would agree. I think having some concrete examples to look at would help the decision making process. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. "Chou, Wu (Wu)" <wuchou@avaya.com> Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 05/05/2009 05:30 PM To <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>, <member-ws-resource-access@w3.org> cc "Gilbert Pilz" <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>, "Geoff Bullen" <Geoff.Bullen@microsoft.com>, "Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com> Subject Re: [Bug 6401] Draft proposal of issue 6401 Here is our concrete proposal of issue 6401 that was submitted to 6401 Task team on 05/04/09. It is based on Gil's original proposal with amendments. An overview page is provided to illustrate the approach. This proposal should be treated as work in progress. Comments/suggestions/contributions are welcome and appreciated. Regards, - Wu Chou/Li Li Avaya Labs Research [attachment "6401_proposal_v0.5.pdf" deleted by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM]
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 13:31:26 UTC