- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:50:08 -0400
- To: "Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com>
- Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org, public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org, "Chou, Wu (Wu)" <wuchou@avaya.com>
- Message-ID: <OFE3FBA6DB.6EADD015-ON85257582.00675AF2-85257582.006779BD@us.ibm.com>
Right -that's batching or box-carring. And if we want to support that I think we need to define a new Format so it can be used regardless of whether we're pushing or pulling notifications. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. "Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com> Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 03/23/2009 02:46 PM To Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS cc <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>, <public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org>, "Chou, Wu (Wu)" <wuchou@avaya.com> Subject RE: Issue 6432: updated proposal Doug, I meant in one subscription created by mc, is it possible that one mc request will pull back mutiple queued messages, or is it always one mc request for one message. Suppose there are two messages queued for a subscription, in the first case we have these messages: mc request msg1 msg2 in the second case, we can only have mc request msg1 mc request msg2 thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:33 PM To: Li, Li (Li) Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org; public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org; Chou, Wu (Wu) Subject: Re: Issue 6432: updated proposal It depends on what you mean by multiple messages. If you mean "batching" then sure that can be done but since this could be wanted even for Push style I think that's best left for the new Format element. However, this can be very complicated though since some Notifications could generate faults and its not clear what the processing model would be. If you mean "pulling from multiple subscriptions" then yes - you can do this optimization by using the same MCanonURI in multiple NotifyTo EPRs. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. "Li Li" <lli5@avaya.com> Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 03/23/2009 12:34 PM To <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org> cc "Chou, Wu \(Wu\)" <wuchou@exchange.avaya.com> Subject Re: Issue 6432: updated proposal Doug, The MakeConnection standard suggests that the event sink initiates a connection for each message. Is it possible that the event sink initiates a connection for multiple messages?
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 18:51:07 UTC