W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Issue 6432: updated proposal

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:32:31 -0400
To: "Li Li" <lli5@avaya.com>
Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org, public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org, "Chou, Wu \(Wu\)" <wuchou@exchange.avaya.com>
Message-ID: <OFED3FE20C.AA89376C-ON85257582.005FEC2F-85257582.00605EB0@us.ibm.com>
It depends on what you mean by multiple messages.  If you mean "batching" 
then sure that can be done but since this could be wanted even for Push 
style I think that's best left for the new Format element.  However, this 
can be very complicated though since some Notifications could generate 
faults and its not clear what the processing model would be.  If you mean 
"pulling from multiple subscriptions" then yes - you can do this 
optimization by using the same MCanonURI in multiple NotifyTo EPRs.

STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

"Li Li" <lli5@avaya.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
03/23/2009 12:34 PM

"Chou, Wu \(Wu\)" <wuchou@exchange.avaya.com>
Re: Issue 6432: updated proposal


The MakeConnection standard suggests that the event sink initiates a
connection for each message. Is it possible that the event sink initiates 
connection for multiple messages?
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 17:33:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:34:35 UTC