RE: WS-Eventing issue 6424 proposal

if you think this is a real issue, then you should probably file a separate bug for it, as it does not seem to have any real connection with issue 6424.

From: [] On Behalf Of Gilbert Pilz
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 3:18 PM
To: Chou, Wu (Wu)
Cc: Doug Davis; Li Li;;; Geoff Bullen
Subject: Re: WS-Eventing issue 6424 proposal

I know I should have said this earlier, but I'm a bit concerned that WS-Eventing is requiring the presence of a header which is optional in the WS-Addressing specification that defines that header:
This OPTIONAL element (whose content is of type xs:anyURI) provides the value for the [destination] property. If this element is NOT present then the value of the [destination] property is ""<>.
I foresee implementation problems due to the fact that the presence or absence of the wsa:To header may be solely under the control of the WS-Addressing message handler and may not be controllable by the code that creates the wse:Subscribe message.

- gp

Chou, Wu (Wu) wrote:

Many thanks for your comments and suggestions, especially the one regarding the cardinality. Here is an updated Infoset draft (v7) of the Subscribe Section of Eventing (clean+marked copies). We really moved a long way with all comments and contributions received.


- Wu Chou.

Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 23:36:05 UTC