Re: Edits to the Minutes of 2009-02-24 have been posted

Were these comments included in your discussion at the last WG meeting?
thanks
-bob

On Mar 6, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Geoff Bullen wrote:

> Bob,
>
> We do not agree that the current minutes accurately capture the  
> events that occurred during the WS-RA con call of 2/24/09, in  
> particular between 21:23 and 21:27.  During this four minute period  
> the WG moved from discussing a proposal that Microsoft had just  
> made, to voting between two proposals as a means to gain consensus.   
> The minutes do not agree with the IRC log, and neither adequately  
> capture the discussion that took place during this period.
>
> We do not want to get into a "he said, she said" argument here, or a  
> battle over the semantics of various words, we just want our  
> disagreement with this section of the minutes noted and for us all  
> to move on.
>
> --Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 
> ] On Behalf Of Bob Freund
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:54 AM
> To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
> Subject: Edits to the Minutes of 2009-02-24 have been posted
>
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/9/02/2009-02-24.html