- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:17:56 -0500
- To: Geoff Bullen <Geoff.Bullen@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Bob Freund <bob@freunds.com>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>, public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF594DAA25.B8448DCC-ON8525756E.006EED1D-8525756E.006F83B8@us.ibm.com>
Just my 2 cents... > 2) In "Issues with proposals" section under Issue 6398, after text: > > geoff: align with http, backward comp, ws-i bp compliance > options for compliant to bp: relax, use policy, or go to bp wg > > We would like the following text added after this: > > Geoff only described summary section of proposal. It was decided > that there was no need to go through the whole thing - "People can > read" was one comment made. I'd like to see some text that makes it clear that: Bob asked several times and ways to see if people had any more questions about either proposal and no one spoke up. > 3) Later in same section, there was a comment: > > geoff: voting on it is too soon, need more time to discuss. > > We would like that extended to: > > geoff: voting on it is too soon, need more time to discuss. My > proposal was only submitted yesterday and there were new comments on > the mailing list about it as little as 10 minutes before the start > of this call. > > 4) Later in the same section, there was a comment: > > bob: Will more discussion help the decision? > > We would like this changed to: > > bob: Will more discussion on Geoff's proposal help the decision? Actually, I seem to recall that: Bob asked if anyone's position would change with more discussions and no one spoke up. This wasn't specific to Geoff's proposal but rather to the issue itself. I think adding this text would be helpful. > We have enclosed a word doc of the minutes, highlighting our > proposed changes, for your convenience. > Best Regards, > Geoff > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws- > resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bob Freund > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 5:22 AM > To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > Subject: Agenda, WS-RA 2009-03-03 > > Topic: Opening > Roll > Selection of scribe, see scribe list[1] > Approval of this Agenda > Approval of Minutes from 2009-02-24 [2] > > Topic: WG Admistrivia > -Reminder to develop an opinion by March 10 on adding a f2f at the W3C > Tech Plenary 2-6 November in Santa Clara; Potential WG meeting 11/2, > 3, 5, and 6 (Must respond by March 18) > > Topic: FPWD SoTD comments, Publication Status > -Is WG ok with proposal in http://lists.w3. > org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Mar/0000.html > ? > > Topic: Action item review http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/tracker/actions/open > > Topic: Acceptance of New Issues > -Issue-6632 RT - Define fault for cases where the GetResult is too > large http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6632 -Bullen > -Issue-6633 RT - Namespaces in updates http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6633 > -Bullen > -Issue-6634 RT - Document algorithm for modify http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6634 > -Bullen > -Issue-6635 RT - Outer resource with individually addressable inner > resources http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6635 -Bullen > -Issue-6636 RT - Add example of resource after the create http: > //www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6636 > -Bullen > -Issue-6639 MEX: make actionURIs consistent http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6639 > -Davis > -Issue-6641 RA: How to get the XSD http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6641 > -Davis > -Issue-6642 WS-Eventing does not describe how to advertise policy for > Subscription Manager http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi? > id=6642 -Pilz > > Topic: Issues with proposals > -Issue-6587 RA: Consistent text for 'Notational Conventions' http: > //www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6587 > -Warr > -Issue-6424 Eventing-Adopting XML Infoset Representation in WS- > Eventing http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6424 -Li > -Issue-6392 Transfer- GetResponse violates WS-I BP http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6392 > -Davis > -Issue-6396 Transfer-CreateResponse violates WS-I BP http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6396 > -Davis > -Issue-6588 Transfer: Changes uses of soap: transport to http: > transport http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6588 -Davis > > > -Issue-6400 Eventing-SubscriptionEnd violates WS-I BP http://www. > w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6400 > -Davis > -Issue-6425 Eventing-Clarify How to Address Event Source http://www. > w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6425 > -Li > -Issue-6428 Eventing: Separate Event Delivery Mode and Format http: > //www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6428 > -Li > -Issue-6429 Eventing: Standardize Wrapped Event Sink http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6429 > -Li > -Issue-6430 Eventing-Remove Attribute wse:EventSource http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6430 > -Li > -Issue-6431 Eventing-Add Pause/Resume Subscription http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6431 > -Li > -Issue-6498 Eventing: Define fault action URI http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6498 > -Bullen > > -Issue-6399 Enumeration-EnumerationEnd violate WS-I BP http://www. > w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6399 > -Issue-6403 Enumeration - define policy http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6403 > > > -Issue-6413 Transfer- merge RT in T http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6413 > -Davis > -Issue-6594 Transfer: Add extensibility points for WS-Transfer > wrappers http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6594 -Davis > > -Issue-6404 MEX- define the MEX dialect http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6404 > -Davis > -Issue-6418 MEX - When requesting metadata, what should provider > return? http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6418 -Bullen > -Issue-6463 MEX-Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata http://www. > w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6463 > -Warr > -Issue-6604 MEX: Define a way to ask for more than one MEX dialect > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6604 > -Davis > > Needing Proposals and Discussion: (list is only partially complete) > -Issue-6401 WS-Eventing Notifications violates WS-I BP http://www. > w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6401 > -Davis > -Issue-6402 WS-Eventing - define policy http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6402 > -Davis > -Issue-6421 Eventing-Extension point in reply message of Unsubscribe > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6421 > -Bullen > -Issue-6432 WS-Eventing Push delivery mode does not work when the > subscriber is not addressable http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6432 > -Pilz > -Issue-6435 WS-Eventing needs state table to fully describe protocol > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6435 > -Pilz > -Issue-6436 WS-Enumeration needs state table to fully describe > protocol http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6436 -Pilz > -Issue-6406 WS-MEX - define policy http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6406 > -Davis > -Issue-6411 WS-MEX: no way to create metadata http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6411 > -Davis > -Issue-6407 WS-RT - define policy http://www.w3. > org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6407 > -Davis > -Issue-6422 RT - Introduces An Ad Hoc Boxcarring Mechanism http: > //www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6422 > -Bullen > > AOB > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/chair-tools/scribelist.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/9/02/2009-02-24.html > > [attachment "2009-02-24.doc" deleted by Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM]
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2009 20:18:41 UTC