RE: Suggested Wording to Resolve Issues 6719 and 6720

+1 to Ashok. This is an attempt to clarify.

Read your comment on MAY. We simply do not understand why the MAY should be changed to MUST. The WS-MetadataExchange does not impose any such limitations on a metadata resource.

Regards,

Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ashok malhotra
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 10:26 AM
To: Doug Davis
Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org; public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
Subject: Re: Suggested Wording to Resolve Issues 6719 and 6720

Doug, I would rather keep the second para as it makes the use of the MEX 
dialect explicit.
Let's discuss on the call and see how others feel..  This is not a 
showstopper!
All the best, Ashok


Doug Davis wrote:
>
> Hi Ashok,
>   it looks good - just a couple of minor suggested edits.
>
>
> thanks
> -Doug
> ______________________________________________________
> STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
> (919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
> The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
>
>
> *ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>*
> Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
>
> 07/24/2009 11:00 AM
> Please respond to
> ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
>
>
> 	
> To
> 	"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	Suggested Wording to Resolve Issues 6719 and 6720
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> Attached
> -- 
> All the best, Ashok and Asir
> [attachment "Wording for Issue 6719 and 6720.doc" deleted by Doug 
> Davis/Raleigh/IBM]

Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 18:01:08 UTC