Re: RA WD Spec Issues - Transfer

Geoff,
1 - fixed
2 - will be fixed when we published
3 - I think that was done just to be consistent across all 5 specs - but 
it can wait until the next rev.  Reverted for now.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com



Geoff Bullen <Geoff.Bullen@microsoft.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
02/12/2009 06:32 PM

To
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
cc

Subject
RA WD Spec Issues - Transfer






Next installment: Transfer Issues
1.      Heading: (WS-T) should be (WS-Transfer)
2.      The link: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-tra/fault needs to be 
resolved
3.      The draft version seems to change :
An ellipsis (i.e. "?") indicates a point of extensibility that allows 
other child or attribute content. Additional children and/or attributes 
MAY be added at the indicated extension points but MUST NOT contradict the 
semantics of the parent and/or owner, respectively. If a receiver does not 
recognize an extension, the receiver SHOULD ignore it.
To:
Ellipses (i.e., "...") indicate points of extensibility. Additional 
children and/or attributes MAY be added at the indicated extension points 
but MUST NOT contradict the semantics of the parent and/or owner, 
respectively. By default, if a receiver does not recognize an extension, 
the receiver SHOULD ignore the extension; exceptions to this processing 
rule, if any, are clearly indicated below.
The intent seems to be the same in both.
Is there an issue with the original wording?  If so, lets? open an issue 
for it.  Either way, it would be best to change the wording back to the 
original wording for this draft, to be consistent.
 
--Geoff