Re: RA WD Spec Issues - Transfer

Hi Geoff 

Regarding (3), it was simply because I (wrongly) assumed that the 
notational conventions would be standard across specs so I cut-and-paste 
the appropriate content from the ws-rt spec during the conversion process. 
  I'll change the text back to the original and raise an issue for 
consistency of text for notations and terminology across all the specs.

Best regards,
Katy



From:
Geoff Bullen <Geoff.Bullen@microsoft.com>
To:
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Date:
12/02/2009 23:34
Subject:
RA WD Spec Issues - Transfer



Next installment: Transfer Issues
1.      Heading: (WS-T) should be (WS-Transfer)
2.      The link: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-tra/fault needs to be 
resolved
3.      The draft version seems to change :
An ellipsis (i.e. "…") indicates a point of extensibility that allows 
other child or attribute content. Additional children and/or attributes 
MAY be added at the indicated extension points but MUST NOT contradict the 
semantics of the parent and/or owner, respectively. If a receiver does not 
recognize an extension, the receiver SHOULD ignore it.
To:
Ellipses (i.e., "...") indicate points of extensibility. Additional 
children and/or attributes MAY be added at the indicated extension points 
but MUST NOT contradict the semantics of the parent and/or owner, 
respectively. By default, if a receiver does not recognize an extension, 
the receiver SHOULD ignore the extension; exceptions to this processing 
rule, if any, are clearly indicated below.
The intent seems to be the same in both.
Is there an issue with the original wording?  If so, lets’ open an issue 
for it.  Either way, it would be best to change the wording back to the 
original wording for this draft, to be consistent.
 
--Geoff
 







Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU