- From: Li, Li (Li) <lli5@avaya.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:30:31 -0400
- To: <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
- Li's edit: "These <add>Events and</add>Notifications MAY be described via a Web Services Definition Language..." is not quite correct. WSDL describes the messages that flow over the wire. In this case the messages are Notifications not Events. While its true that Events are usually someplace in the message, the WSDL may or may not describe them. For example, in a wrapped notification the WSDL has nothing that describes the Events at all - its just an xs:any in a wrapper. We can discuss this more during the next call. Doug: 1) It seems to me that your statement "While its true that Events are usually someplace in the message, the WSDL may or may not describe them" is equivalent to "These Events and Notifications MAY be described via a Web Services Definition Language...". 2) I think "Web Services Definition Language" should be "Web Services Description Language" to match the official WSDL 1.1 spec title. Thanks. Li
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2009 14:31:12 UTC