- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:30:16 -0400
- To: Katy Warr <katy_warr@uk.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org, public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFAFB69966.3E5B26FC-ON8525759F.005A6017-8525759F.005AABB7@us.ibm.com>
Katy, 1 - probably a consistency error, yes. 2 - I assumed that the lack of any FilterDialects in the Policy (but the presence of the WEnum policy assertion) meant no dialects were supported (or at least, no statements were being made about any) so the client should not be surprised if the service faults the use of the Filter element. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. Katy Warr <katy_warr@uk.ibm.com> Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 04/21/2009 10:10 AM To public-ws-resource-access@w3.org cc Subject Issue 6403: Enumertion Policy - some things for us to consider Just wondering whether we need to consider the following in the context of http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6403 proposal?: 1) The wsenp:WSEnumeration policy indicates that WS-Enumeration MUST be used when communicating with this endpoint. I think this is shorthand for defining the data source enumeration operations at the endpoint (i.e. enumerate, pull, renew, getstatus and release). Because of the 'MUST', would it therefore be an error to attach wsenp:Ennumeration policy wsp:Optional=FALSE to an endpoint if that endpoint also supported other (non-enum) operations? 2) We should consider whether an endpoint must advertise all the filter dialects that it supports using: <x:FilterDialect xmlns:x="xs:anyURI" wsp:Optional="true"/> If we don't mandate that all supported filter dialects are advertised in the policy, do we need a mechanism for an enumeration endpoint to indicate that it does not support filtering at all (i.e. including a filter on the enumerate verb will return wesn:FilteringNotSupported)? Thanks, Katy Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2009 16:31:11 UTC