- From: Katy Warr <katy_warr@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:10:34 +0100
- To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFE9C8A895.3640E61C-ON8025759F.004BAAC3-8025759F.004DDFBE@uk.ibm.com>
Just wondering whether we need to consider the following in the context of http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6403 proposal?: 1) The wsenp:WSEnumeration policy indicates that WS-Enumeration MUST be used when communicating with this endpoint. I think this is shorthand for defining the data source enumeration operations at the endpoint (i.e. enumerate, pull, renew, getstatus and release). Because of the 'MUST', would it therefore be an error to attach wsenp:Ennumeration policy wsp:Optional=FALSE to an endpoint if that endpoint also supported other (non-enum) operations? 2) We should consider whether an endpoint must advertise all the filter dialects that it supports using: <x:FilterDialect xmlns:x="xs:anyURI" wsp:Optional="true"/> If we don't mandate that all supported filter dialects are advertised in the policy, do we need a mechanism for an enumeration endpoint to indicate that it does not support filtering at all (i.e. including a filter on the enumerate verb will return wesn:FilteringNotSupported)? Thanks, Katy Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2009 14:11:17 UTC