Re: 2009-03-31 Snapshots

Hey Geoff,
  comments inline.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



Geoff Bullen <Geoff.Bullen@microsoft.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
04/20/2009 07:40 PM

To
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
cc

Subject
2009-03-31 Snapshots






Hi all,
I have looked at these snapshots and have the following comments on the 
implementation of the resolved issues into the specs.
To cross check, I used the change logs that appeared at the bottom of each 
of the specs, dated 2009-03-31.  I assume those change logs are accurate. 
Has anyone else reviewed these specs?
--Geoff
 
 
Transfer
Issue: 6391
1.      There is no definition for wsam in the spec and there are a number 
of places that still say wsa:Action rather than wsam:Action, for example 
Section 2.3 and most of the examples.  Please go through and change all 
occurrences of wsa:Action to wsam:Action.
<dug> I think the spec is right - its wsa:Action for the soap header, but 
wsam:Action in the wsdl. no? </dug>
Issue: 6388
2.      This is in the change log but is not a transfer issue, it is not 
even related to WS-RA.  What should this issue be?
<dug> near as I can tell it was supposed to be 6388 </dug>
Issue: 6398
3.      In GetResponse example, the <GetResponse> element should be 
<wst:GetResponse>
<dug> fixed </dug>
 
Eventing
Issue 6391
4.       There is no definition for wsam in the spec and there are a 
number of places that still say wsa:Action rather than wsam:Action, for 
example most of the examples.  Please go through and change all 
occurrences of wsa:Action to wsam:Action.
<dug> see above </dug>
               Issue 6400
5.        This issue is in the change log twice
Mex
               Issue   6391
6.       There is no definition for wsam in the spec and there are a 
number of places that still say wsa:Action rather than wsam:Action, for 
example most of the examples.  Please go through and change all 
occurrences of wsa:Action to wsam:Action.
<dug> see above for this and the rest </dug>
Enum
               Issue 6391
7.       There is no definition for wsam in the spec and there are a 
number of places that still say wsa:Action rather than wsam:Action, for 
example most of the examples.  Please go through and change all 
occurrences of wsa:Action to wsam:Action.
RT
8.       There is no definition for wsam in the spec and there are a 
number of places that still say wsa:Action rather than wsam:Action, for 
example most of the examples.  Please go through and change all 
occurrences of wsa:Action to wsam:Action.
9.