W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Ordering of Assertions: Comment on WS-Policy Primer LCWD

From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:58:43 -0700
Message-ID: <470D3D03.2070507@oracle.com>
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
CC: public-ws-policy@w3.org

Hi Dave:
I used the fact that WS-SecurityPolicy discusses order to motivate the 
need for order in at least some policies.
I also quoted from the note from Tony Rogers.  Subsequently, there was a 
note from Bob Natale who agrees that
order is important but does not like the solution I suggested.

What needs to be made clear is that order is not important in all 
policies, but there are situations where it is important
and for these situations we need a solution.

Ashok

David Orchard wrote:

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
>>[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ashok malhotra
>>Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 9:56 AM
>>To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
>>Subject: Ordering of Assertions: Comment on WS-Policy Primer LCWD
>>    
>>
><snip/>
>  
>
>>In many cases the 
>>order in which assertions are processed may not matter, but 
>>where it does matter do we need to specify a special 
>>assertion for every pair of assertions that need to be 
>>ordered? Clearly, this is not feasible as the Policy 
>>processing engine will need to be undated whenever a new 
>>ordering assertion is added. So, what we need is a 
>>general-purpose ordering assertion.
>>    
>>
>
>Your note jumps from assumption to conclusion to design with great
>speed, indeed from assumption to conclusion within 3 sentences.  Those 3
>fleety sentences do not answer my previous emails central question of
>"when does order matter?".  In case my question was missed, perhaps
>because of burdensom length of my previous message, I'll ask again more
>succinctly:
>
>When does order matter?  
>
>Until the use case is agreed by the WG, design discussions are very
>premature IMHO.
>
>Cheers,
>Dave
>
>
>  
>


-- 
All the best, Ashok
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 21:01:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:34 UTC