- From: Sergey Beryozkin <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:38:37 -0000
- To: "Maryann Hondo" <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2007 14:41:02 UTC
Hi Maryann
This ammendment is better/clearer than the text I proposed, thanks a lot.
+1 to updating the Ignorable section in the primer as suggested in your ammendment
Cheers, Sergey
----- Original Message -----
From: Maryann Hondo
To: Sergey Beryozkin
Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:13 AM
Subject: friendly ammendment to 4339
Sergey in response to the bug you filed: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4339
would you consider a friendly ammendment?
Target: WS-Policy Primer
Sergey's Proposal : Update the last sentence : "Please note that the ignorableness is at the discretion of policy consumers therefore ignorable assertions may have an
impact on determining compatibility of policies"
Proposed Friendly Ammendment:
"Please note that the impact of the ignorable attribute is at
the discretion of policy consumers (through selection of "lax" or "strict" mode) therefore ignorable assertions may have an effect on determining compatibility of policies"
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2007 14:41:02 UTC