RE: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0

There are a few other typos as well.  I can deal with those and c, d.  

Ashok, can you answer a and b?

I've updated the round 4 docs with your previous post.

Cheers,
Dave 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 5:42 PM
> To: Ashok Malhotra; public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0
> 
> 
> Few follow up questions/comments:
> 
> a) Shouldn't there be two expected results (one for Test case 
> 1 and another for Test case 2) in both these documents?
> 
> b) In the WSDL 20 test case, the input WSDL document has a 
> PolicyReference element (<wsp:PolicyReference 
> URI="#A12Endpoint). Is that intentional?
> 
> c) Typos in WSDL 20 test cases - 
> s/#wsdlBindingMessageReference/#wsdl.bindingMessageReference/g
> 
> d) Typos in WSDL 11 test cases -
> s/#wsdl11.binding.input/#wsdl11.bindingOperation.input/g
> s/#wsdl11.binding.output/#wsdl11.bindingOperation.output/g
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> Microsoft Corporation
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ashok Malhotra
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:48 PM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0
> 
> I have made the changes that Asir suggested.  Please take a look.
> 
> 
> 
> All the best, Ashok
> 
>

Received on Friday, 9 March 2007 01:51:24 UTC