RE: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0

David:
Revised testcases are attached.

Re. c) and d) I changed as requested.  If the typos were in the WSDL 1.1 Identifiers document and not the testcases then these would have to be fixed.

All the best, Ashok
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 5:51 PM
> To: Asir Vedamuthu; Ashok Malhotra; public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0
> 
> 
> There are a few other typos as well.  I can deal with those and c, d.
> 
> Ashok, can you answer a and b?
> 
> I've updated the round 4 docs with your previous post.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dave
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 5:42 PM
> > To: Ashok Malhotra; public-ws-policy@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0
> >
> >
> > Few follow up questions/comments:
> >
> > a) Shouldn't there be two expected results (one for Test case
> > 1 and another for Test case 2) in both these documents?
> >
> > b) In the WSDL 20 test case, the input WSDL document has a
> > PolicyReference element (<wsp:PolicyReference
> > URI="#A12Endpoint). Is that intentional?
> >
> > c) Typos in WSDL 20 test cases -
> > s/#wsdlBindingMessageReference/#wsdl.bindingMessageReference/g
> >
> > d) Typos in WSDL 11 test cases -
> > s/#wsdl11.binding.input/#wsdl11.bindingOperation.input/g
> > s/#wsdl11.binding.output/#wsdl11.bindingOperation.output/g
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Asir S Vedamuthu
> > Microsoft Corporation
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ashok Malhotra
> > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:48 PM
> > To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> > Subject: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0
> >
> > I have made the changes that Asir suggested.  Please take a look.
> >
> >
> >
> > All the best, Ashok
> >
> >
>