- From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:42:09 -0800
- To: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Few follow up questions/comments: a) Shouldn't there be two expected results (one for Test case 1 and another for Test case 2) in both these documents? b) In the WSDL 20 test case, the input WSDL document has a PolicyReference element (<wsp:PolicyReference URI="#A12Endpoint). Is that intentional? c) Typos in WSDL 20 test cases - s/#wsdlBindingMessageReference/#wsdl.bindingMessageReference/g d) Typos in WSDL 11 test cases - s/#wsdl11.binding.input/#wsdl11.bindingOperation.input/g s/#wsdl11.binding.output/#wsdl11.bindingOperation.output/g Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu Microsoft Corporation -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ashok Malhotra Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:48 PM To: public-ws-policy@w3.org Subject: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 I have made the changes that Asir suggested. Please take a look. All the best, Ashok
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 01:43:43 UTC