- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:14:51 -0800
- To: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
This is a reminder that we discussed this proposal at the Feb 7 meeting and held off making a decision about the proposed three "at risk" features until next week's meeting. We also agreed to have some email discussion which I am trying to encourage by bringing this back to your attention. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu > Sent: February 7, 2007 11:16 AM > To: public-ws-policy@w3.org > Subject: Features at Risk > > > To advance WS-Policy to Proposed Recommendation, the Working Group needs > to show that each feature in the Framework and Attachment drafts has been > implemented. Thus far, there aren't any publicly visible implementations > for the following features: > > a) Ignorable Policy Assertions > b) External Policy Attachment > c) Attaching Policies Using UDDI > > For a successful Candidate Recommendation phase, we request the WG to > consider marking features a)-c) as being at risk (the history is that most > of the features marked as being at risk were implemented by multiple > vendors). > > Also, in Nov, W3C requested the Working Group to consider marking feature > a) as being at risk [1]. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0077.html > > Regards, > > Asir S Vedamuthu > Microsoft Corporation >
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:15:06 UTC