- From: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:28:46 -0500
- To: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>, public-ws-policy@w3.org
- Cc: Rajesh Koilpillai <Rajesh.Koilpillai@webmethods.com>, "Snow, Skip [CCC-OT_IT]" <skip.snow@citigroup.com>
Hi, > c) Attaching Policies Using UDDI webMethods expects to have a UDDI server implementation that supports attaching policy to UDDI entities as defined in the specification. We would be opposed to marking this as a feature at risk. I have copied Skip Snow from Citigroup, that has shown an interest in this space. Regards, Prasad -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:18 AM To: public-ws-policy@w3.org Subject: Features at Risk To advance WS-Policy to Proposed Recommendation, the Working Group needs to show that each feature in the Framework and Attachment drafts has been implemented. Thus far, there aren't any publicly visible implementations for the following features: a) Ignorable Policy Assertions b) External Policy Attachment c) Attaching Policies Using UDDI For a successful Candidate Recommendation phase, we request the WG to consider marking features a)-c) as being at risk (the history is that most of the features marked as being at risk were implemented by multiple vendors). Also, in Nov, W3C requested the Working Group to consider marking feature a) as being at risk [1]. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0077.html Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu Microsoft Corporation
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:29:00 UTC